Adrian Kempe vs Marcus Foligno
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Kings skaters
- Adrian Kempe
- Artemi Panarin
- Quinton Byfield
- Alex Laferriere
- Scott Laughton
- Erik Haula
- Alex Turcotte
- Andre Lee
- Trevor Moore
- Joel Armia
- Mats Zuccarello
- Corey Perry
- Cody Ceci
- Mikey Anderson
- Brandt Clarke
- Brian Dumoulin
- Drew Doughty
- Samuel Helenius
- Erik Gustafsson
- Joel Edmundson
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Wild skaters
- Kirill Kaprizov
- Matt Boldy
- Quinn Hughes
- Blake Coleman
- Joel Eriksson Ek
- Marcus Foligno
- Michael McCarron
- Maxim Shabanov
- Nick Foligno
- Yakov Trenin
- Danila Yurov
- Bobby Brink
- Ryan Hartman
- Olli Maatta
- Daemon Hunt
- Jared Spurgeon
- Zach Bogosian
- Jonas Brodin
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Adrian Kempe is ahead on 7 of 13 measures. The widest gap is prevents per 60: Marcus Foligno sits in the 98th percentile, Adrian Kempe the 7th.
| Measure | Kempe | Foligno |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 2 | 0 |
| Goals | 1 | 0 |
| Assists | 1 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 20:42 | 12:10 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.8399 pct | 0.1866 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 8.099 pct | 1.532 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.79 pct | −0.421 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 60.1%71 pct | 60.3%73 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 2.9271 pct | 2.1341 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 1.9464 pct | 1.4089 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | −0.0727 pct | +0.6694 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.1965 pct | +0.2876 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | −0.267 pct | +0.3898 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →




































