Scott Laughton vs Timothy Liljegren
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Kings · CScott LaughtonChange first player
Kings skaters
- Adrian Kempe
- Artemi Panarin
- Quinton Byfield
- Alex Laferriere
- Scott Laughton
- Erik Haula
- Alex Turcotte
- Andre Lee
- Trevor Moore
- Joel Armia
- Mats Zuccarello
- Corey Perry
- Cody Ceci
- Mikey Anderson
- Brandt Clarke
- Brian Dumoulin
- Drew Doughty
- Samuel Helenius
- Erik Gustafsson
- Joel Edmundson
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Capitals · DTimothy LiljegrenChange second player
Capitals skaters
- Alex Tuch
- Dylan Strome
- Ryan Leonard
- Jakob Chychrun
- Anthony Beauvillier
- Cole Hutson
- Tom Wilson
- Aliaksei Protas
- Boone Jenner
- Martin Fehérváry
- Matt Roy
- Jordan Kyrou
- Justin Sourdif
- Pierre-Luc Dubois
- Alex Ovechkin
- Timothy Liljegren
- Vincent Desharnais
- Ilya Protas
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Timothy Liljegren is ahead on 8 of 10 measures. The widest gap is chances against per 60: Timothy Liljegren sits in the 80th percentile, Scott Laughton the 8th.
| Measure | Laughton | Liljegren |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 0 | 0 |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 14:19 | 18:00 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.1969 pct | 0.0214 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 2.560 pct | 1.532 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.419 pct | 0.057 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 46.7%40 pct | 71.4%94 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.2884 pct | 4.1096 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 3.748 pct | 1.6480 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | −0.0925 pct | +0.0644 pct |
| Creates per 60 | −0.0332 pct | +0.0848 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | −0.0631 pct | −0.0336 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →