Gabriel Landeskog vs Stephen Halliday
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Avalanche · LGabriel LandeskogChange first player
Avalanche skaters
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Martin Necas
- Artturi Lehkonen
- Nicolas Roy
- Jaden Schwartz
- Cale Makar
- Nazem Kadri
- T.J. Hughes
- Fedor Svechkov
- Sam Malinski
- Brock Nelson
- Parker Kelly
- Brent Burns
- Gabriel Landeskog
- Josh Manson
- Noah Juulsen
- Devon Toews
- Brett Kulak
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Senators · CStephen HallidayChange second player
Senators skaters
- William Eklund
- Drake Batherson
- Michael Amadio
- Tim Stützle
- Stephen Halliday
- Shane Pinto
- Dylan Cozens
- Claude Giroux
- Thomas Chabot
- Hayden Hodgson
- Jordan Spence
- Carter Yakemchuk
- Warren Foegele
- Fabian Zetterlund
- Nick Cousins
- Nikolas Matinpalo
- Tyler Kleven
- Cameron Crotty
- Jake Sanderson
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Gabriel Landeskog is ahead on 6 of 9 measures. The widest gap is expected goals per game: Stephen Halliday sits in the 87th percentile, Gabriel Landeskog the 19th.
| Measure | Landeskog | Halliday |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 2 | 1 |
| Goals | 1 | 1 |
| Assists | 1 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 16:14 | 9:53 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.0319 pct | 0.3387 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 0.57 pct | 2.560 pct |
| Goals above expected | +0.994 pct | +0.374 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 58.7%67 pct | — |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.3787 pct | — |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.3745 pct | — |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.5991 pct | +0.4383 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.2877 pct | +0.5293 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.3194 pct | −0.0926 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →