Skip to content

Joel Edmundson vs Mattias Ekholm

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Mattias Ekholm is ahead on 6 of 9 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Mattias Ekholm sits in the 56th percentile, Joel Edmundson the 3rd.

MeasureEdmundsonEkholm
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game14:2621:26
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.018 pct0.0213 pct
Shot attempts per game1.017 pct1.017 pct
Goals above expected0.061 pct−0.153 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share69.7%91 pct57.8%65 pct
Chances for per 602.2243 pct3.0376 pct
Chances against per 600.9796 pct2.2152 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.493 pct+0.1556 pct
Creates per 60−0.491 pct+0.0950 pct
Prevents per 600.0042 pct+0.0658 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →