Nick Foligno vs Zach Bogosian
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Wild · LNick FolignoChange first player
Wild skaters
- Kirill Kaprizov
- Matt Boldy
- Quinn Hughes
- Blake Coleman
- Joel Eriksson Ek
- Marcus Foligno
- Michael McCarron
- Maxim Shabanov
- Nick Foligno
- Yakov Trenin
- Danila Yurov
- Bobby Brink
- Ryan Hartman
- Olli Maatta
- Daemon Hunt
- Jared Spurgeon
- Jonas Brodin
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Wild · DZach BogosianChange second player
Wild skaters
- Kirill Kaprizov
- Matt Boldy
- Quinn Hughes
- Blake Coleman
- Joel Eriksson Ek
- Marcus Foligno
- Michael McCarron
- Maxim Shabanov
- Yakov Trenin
- Danila Yurov
- Bobby Brink
- Ryan Hartman
- Olli Maatta
- Daemon Hunt
- Jared Spurgeon
- Zach Bogosian
- Jonas Brodin
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Nick Foligno is ahead on 10 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Nick Foligno sits in the 61st percentile, Zach Bogosian the 17th.
| Measure | Foligno | Bogosian |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 1 | 0 |
| Goals | 1 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 13:11 | 15:13 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.0944 pct | 0.003 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 1.532 pct | 0.57 pct |
| Goals above expected | +0.889 pct | 0.065 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 59.2%69 pct | 53.3%55 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 2.0840 pct | 2.4654 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 1.4388 pct | 2.1555 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.1961 pct | −0.1917 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.0746 pct | −0.1617 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.1271 pct | −0.0336 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →