Sat, Sep 6, 11:45 PM
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ULM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ALA | 21 | 21 | 10 | 21 | 73 |
Our model blends Elo ratings (ALA Elo 1755, ULM Elo 1281) plus home-field advantage. That projects ALA -21.4 (94% to win) — 12.6 points of value on ULM versus the market line of -34.
ALA up 52 entering the 4th quarter. Across 41 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
UL Monroe 0, Alabama 73.
Yes — the model's pick (ALA) was correct.
Why trust the number?Gridpex's model is walk-forward validated on 2014–24, out-of-sample: +0.28 pts mean Closing Line Value and 53.5% beat the close. We report the record — wins and losses — never fake locks.
Called it — I had ALA pregame. ✓ We log the misses too, but not this one.