Sat, Sep 20, 4:45 PM
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAB | 0 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 24 |
| TENN | 21 | 21 | 14 | 0 | 56 |
Our model blends Elo ratings (TENN Elo 1809, UAB Elo 1307) plus home-field advantage. That projects TENN -22.5 (95% to win) — 16.5 points of value on UAB versus the market line of -39.
TENN up 39 entering the 4th quarter. Across 218 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
UAB 24, Tennessee 56.
Yes — the model's pick (TENN) was correct.
Why trust the number?Gridpex's model is walk-forward validated on 2014–24, out-of-sample: +0.28 pts mean Closing Line Value and 53.5% beat the close. We report the record — wins and losses — never fake locks.
Called it — I had TENN pregame. ✓ We log the misses too, but not this one.