Troy vs. James Madison: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats


TROYTeam statsJMU
- Q4 3:17JMUDrew Spinogatti 22 Yd Fumble Recovery (Morgan Suarez Kick)14–31
- Q4 4:11JMUAlonza Barnett III 26 Yd Run (Morgan Suarez Kick)14–24
- Q2 2:12TROYTae Meadows 2 Yd Run (Scott Taylor Renfroe Kick)14–17
- Q2 6:56JMUBraeden Wisloski 26 Yd pass from Alonza Barnett III (Morgan Suarez Kick)7–17
- Q2 13:41JMUWayne Knight 73 Yd Run (Morgan Suarez Kick)7–10
- Q2 14:01TROYGoose Crowder 1 Yd Run (Scott Taylor Renfroe Kick)7–3
- Q1 1:55JMUMorgan Suarez 40 Yd Field Goal 0–3
How the model called it
- PassGoose Crowder 15/34, 196 YDS
- RushTae Meadows 7 CAR, 10 YDS, 1 TD
- RecRaRa Thomas 3 REC, 82 YDS
- PassAlonza Barnett III 10/25, 93 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT
- RushWayne Knight 21 CAR, 212 YDS, 1 TD
- RecBraeden Wisloski 2 REC, 31 YDS, 1 TD
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsJMU up 3 entering the 4th quarter. Across 1,457 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
- Q4 6:30JMU +12%
No Huddle-Shotgun #14 A.Barnett III rush middle for 7 yards gain to the JMU24 (#14 D.Daniel-Sisavanh)
- Q4 9:59TROY +9%
PENALTY TROY False Start (#74 T.Townsend) 5 yards from TROY37 to TROY32. NO PLAY
- Q4 4:11JMU +8%
No Huddle-Shotgun #14 A.Barnett III rush middle for 26 yards gain to the TROY00 TOUCHDOWN, 1ST DOWN
- Q2 2:12TROY +7%
#22 T.Meadows rush middle for 2 yards gain to the JMU00 TOUCHDOWN
- Q3 1:30TROY +6%
#28 E.Crenshaw punt 48 yards to the JMU00, Touchback
- Q3 1:21JMU +5%
No Huddle-Shotgun #14 A.Barnett III rush left for 21 yards gain to the JMU41 (#14 D.Daniel-Sisavanh), 1ST DOWN
FAQ
What was the final score of Troy vs. James Madison?
Troy 14, James Madison 31.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (JMU) was correct.
| TROY | JMU | |
|---|---|---|
| 177 | Total yards | 411 |
| 203 | Passing yards | 93 |
| -26 | Rushing yards | 318 |
| 12 | First downs | 19 |
| 4-18 | 3rd down | 2-14 |
| 0-2 | 4th down | 1-2 |
| 16/39 | Comp/Att | 10/25 |
| 5.2 | Yards per pass | 3.7 |
| -0.9 | Yards per rush | 7.6 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 4-45 | Penalties | 7-80 |
| 29:26 | Possession | 30:34 |
Costliest call
Q4 12:04 JMU go for it on 4th & 9 at TROY 33. The model preferred field goal, a gap of 0.54 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finish- Q4 3:17JMUDrew Spinogatti 22 Yd Fumble Recovery (Morgan Suarez Kick)14–31
- Q4 4:11JMUAlonza Barnett III 26 Yd Run (Morgan Suarez Kick)14–24
- Q2 2:12TROYTae Meadows 2 Yd Run (Scott Taylor Renfroe Kick)14–17
- Q2 6:56JMUBraeden Wisloski 26 Yd pass from Alonza Barnett III (Morgan Suarez Kick)7–17
- Q2 13:41JMUWayne Knight 73 Yd Run (Morgan Suarez Kick)7–10
- Q2 14:01TROYGoose Crowder 1 Yd Run (Scott Taylor Renfroe Kick)7–3
- Q1 1:55JMUMorgan Suarez 40 Yd Field Goal 0–3
Model prediction
how the number is builtOur model simulates the game drive by drive from each side's opponent-adjusted efficiency (JMU Elo 1937, TROY Elo 1377 for reference), with home-field advantage. That projects JMU -24.8 (94% to win), essentially in line with the market.
Why that percentage is worth reading: across 604 graded in-season games, the calls this model put near 58% came in at 58.2%. The full calibration table is published, bin by bin. Early in the season the cold-start path runs instead and calibrates less well (Brier 0.2028 against 0.1889).
Model as of Sep 1 · through week 1 · drive simulation
Season form — 2025
nationally rankedThe matchup, in context
series history + adjusted profiles| TROY | JMU | |
|---|---|---|
| -16.6 (#116) | CORE overall | +20.6 (#13) |
| -13 / +4 | offense / defense | +5 / -16 |
| 1.77 | points / drive | 3.06 |
| 1.83 | allowed / drive | 1.42 |
| 30% | three-and-outs | 22% |
| +0 | pass over expected | -3 |
Bold is the side ahead. CORE strips the situation from every play and solves the schedule out across the league, so these compare two teams that never met.
Key matchups
The analyst read: each team's offense splits crossed against the opponent's defense, with the edges called out.
Create a free account →You get Pro free for 6 months. No card required.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
