Skip to content
Rara Thomas

#7Rara Thomas

WR·Troy·2025

Rara Thomas is a Versatile WR for Troy. Rara's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 73 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Rara Thomas's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
39 Receptions629 Rec yards5 Rec TD16.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume23
  • Explosiveness61
  • Consistency0
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.32 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.17 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Clemson (SP+ 10).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Malik DunnerBall State0.2900.422.0
Noah ShortArmy0.3000.520.7
Xavier WhiteTexas Tech0.3000.518.6
Chris TyreeNotre Dame0.3100.623.6
Ainias SmithTexas A&M0.3100.517.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.3501.35Wk 1 vs Nicholls: -0.82 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Clemson: +1.17 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Buffalo: +0.31 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs South Alabama: +0.82 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Texas State: -0.35 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UL Monroe: -1.35 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Louisiana: +0.18 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arkansas State: -0.14 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Old Dominion: +0.47 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia State: -0.59 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Southern Miss: +1.16 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs James Madison: +0.52 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsNichollsW38-20177.007-0.82
2@ClemsonL16-279.544010.00191.17
4@BuffaloW21-17-7.557815.61410.31
6vsSouth AlabamaW31-24-12.712525.01250.82
7@Texas StateW48-412.338127.0157-0.35
8@UL MonroeW37-14-21.6199.009-1.35
9vsLouisianaW35-23-10.133612.00150.18
10vsArkansas StateL10-23-8.833110.3024-0.14
12@Old DominionL0-335.922010.00100.47
13vsGeorgia StateW31-19-24.535016.7034-0.59
14@Southern MissW28-18-7.1511823.62751.16
15@James MadisonL14-3112.338227.30430.52
20vsJacksonville StateL13-17-6.755210.4017

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.9%
Passing plays
14.0%
Rushing plays
1.6%
Standard downs
7.2%
Passing downs
9.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.15
Passing downs
0.56
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / -0.42

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.