Portland State vs. Hawai'i: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Portland State0-1

Hawai'i2-1
▸Final
Clarence T.C. Ching Athletics Complex
PORTTeam statsHAW
230Total yards357
189Pass250
41Rush107
16First downs18
4-133rd down9-19
1Turnovers0
25:53Possession34:07
- Q4 0:58HAWKansei Matsuzawa 35 Yd Field Goal 3–23
- Q4 8:12HAWKansei Matsuzawa 47 Yd Field Goal 3–20
- Q3 3:45PORTMathias Uribe 25 Yd Field Goal 3–17
- Q3 9:30HAWKansei Matsuzawa 44 Yd Field Goal 0–17
- Q2 9:39HAWCam Barfield 31 Yd pass from Luke Weaver (Kansei Matsuzawa Kick)0–14
- Q2 13:09HAWCam Barfield 16 Yd pass from Luke Weaver (Kansei Matsuzawa Kick)0–7
How the model called it
Market line
HAW −36.5
Against the number
PORT covered
line HAW −36.5
Kickoff161 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
HAW (top)PORT (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: HAW 100%
Closing line
HAW −36.5
Closing total
54.5
Model line
—
Actual result
PORT 3 – 23 HAW
Portland State
- PassJohn-Keawe Sagapolutele 23/35, 189 YDS, 1 INT
- RushEddy Schultz 3 CAR, 23 YDS
- RecZachary Dodson-Greene 9 REC, 78 YDS
Hawai'i
- PassLuke Weaver 26/42, 240 YDS, 2 TD
- RushLandon Sims 9 CAR, 41 YDS
- RecCam Barfield 4 REC, 50 YDS, 2 TD
25.1sper snap · in line with the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
138
Points / snap
0.19
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsHAW up 14 entering the 4th quarter. Across 1,012 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
94%
HAW went on to win
A near-lock historically
FAQ
What was the final score of Portland State vs. Hawai'i?
Portland State 3, Hawai'i 23.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (HAW) was correct.
PORT
HAW
31%
Success rate
38%
0.21
EPA / pass
0.18
-0.53
EPA / rush
0.11
33%
Early-down success
32%
39%
Pass success
35%
18%
Rush success
43%
7%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
11%
36%
Stuffed rush rate
14%
62%
Pass rate
65%
7.8
Avg 3rd-down distance
7.5
PORT
7.8 yards to go on 3rd down
58 scrimmage snaps
HAW
7.5 yards to go on 3rd down
80 scrimmage snaps
| PORT | HAW | |
|---|---|---|
| 230 | Total yards | 357 |
| 189 | Passing yards | 250 |
| 41 | Rushing yards | 107 |
| 16 | First downs | 18 |
| 4-13 | 3rd down | 9-19 |
| 0-3 | 4th down | 1-1 |
| 23/35 | Comp/Att | 27/45 |
| 5.4 | Yards per pass | 5.6 |
| 1.8 | Yards per rush | 3.7 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 7-65 | Penalties | 13-138 |
| 25:53 | Possession | 34:07 |
PORT
7/8 with the model
−0.1 pts · −0.0% win prob
HAW
8/9 with the model
−1.0 pts · −0.0% win prob
Costliest call
Q2 0:17 HAW punt on 4th & 1 at HAW 38. The model preferred go for it, a gap of 0.97 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishPORT 1/12 scoring drives← own end zone →HAW 5/11 scoring drives
PORTPUNT7 pl, 22 yds· own 25Q1
HAWPUNT8 pl, 31 yds· own 18Q1
PORTINT10 pl, 63 yds· own 12Q1
HAWTD10 pl, 73 yds· own 27Q1
PORTPUNT3 pl, -3 yds· own 16Q2
HAWTD7 pl, 53 yds· own 47Q2
PORTDOWNS7 pl, 47 yds· midfieldQ2
HAWPUNT5 pl, 12 yds· own 3Q2
PORTDOWNS7 pl, 28 yds· own 43Q2
HAWPUNT3 pl, 9 yds· own 29Q2
PORTEND1 pl, -2 yds· own 7Q2
HAWFG12 pl, 61 yds· own 13Q3
PORTPUNT3 pl, -5 yds· own 33Q3
HAWPUNT3 pl, 3 yds· own 30Q3
PORTFG5 pl, 33 yds· opp 40Q3
HAWPUNT5 pl, 24 yds· own 25Q3
PORTPUNT5 pl, 26 yds· own 19Q3
HAWFG14 pl, 51 yds· own 20Q4
PORTPUNT4 pl, 2 yds· own 25Q4
HAWPUNT3 pl, -17 yds· own 42Q4
PORTDOWNS4 pl, 6 yds· own 24Q4
HAWFG7 pl, 13 yds· opp 30Q4
PORTEND3 pl, 22 yds· own 14Q4
- Q4 0:58HAWKansei Matsuzawa 35 Yd Field Goal 3–23
- Q4 8:12HAWKansei Matsuzawa 47 Yd Field Goal 3–20
- Q3 3:45PORTMathias Uribe 25 Yd Field Goal 3–17
- Q3 9:30HAWKansei Matsuzawa 44 Yd Field Goal 0–17
- Q2 9:39HAWCam Barfield 31 Yd pass from Luke Weaver (Kansei Matsuzawa Kick)0–14
- Q2 13:09HAWCam Barfield 16 Yd pass from Luke Weaver (Kansei Matsuzawa Kick)0–7
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
