Skip to content
Luke Weaver

#3Luke Weaver

Luke Weaver is a Dual-Threat QB for Hawai'i. Luke's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 113 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Luke Weaver's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
63/105 Comp/Att628 Pass yards6 Pass TD3 INT60.0% Comp %
Rushing
73 Rush yards0 Rush TD27 Carries2.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch56
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.2800.28Wk 1 vs Arizona: -0.28 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Sam Houston: +0.17 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Portland State: +0.26 EPA/play3
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
0vsStanfordW23-20-11.80/10000.4
1@ArizonaL6-4012.08/16660226.5170-0.28
2vsSam HoustonW37-20-27.827/432943151.92600.17
3vsPortland StateW23-326/422402046.53000.26
20vsCaliforniaW35-31-3.22/3281097.6

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
35.9%
Passing plays
46.8%
Rushing plays
15.9%
Standard downs
33.1%
Passing downs
41.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.24
Pass / Rush EPA
0.15 / 0.41

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.