Eastern Illinois vs. Alabama: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Eastern Illinois

Alabama8-2
▸Final
Bryant-Denny Stadium
EASTTeam statsALA
34Total yards539
20Pass270
14Rush269
2First downs32
1-113rd down8-11
1Turnovers2
21:51Possession38:09
- Q4 1:15ALAAK Dear 5 Yd Run (Tucker Cornelius Kick)0–56
- Q4 7:34ALARichard Young 2 Yd Run (Reid Schuback Kick)0–49
- Q3 1:05ALAAustin Mack 20 Yd Run (Conor Talty Kick)0–42
- Q3 11:03ALAAK Dear 1 Yd Run (Conor Talty Kick)0–35
- Q2 1:05ALAKevin Riley 2 Yd Run (Peter Notaro Kick)0–28
- Q2 10:04ALAKevin Riley 1 Yd Run (Conor Talty Kick)0–21
- Q1 4:49ALADaniel Hill 7 Yd Run (Conor Talty Kick)0–14
- Q1 9:45ALAJam Miller 1 Yd Run (Conor Talty Kick)0–7
How the model called it
Market line
ALA −51.5
Against the number
ALA covered
line ALA −51.5
What the numbers say
- EAST played behind the sticks — third downs that long convert rarely, and ALA did not face the same ones. 3rd & 10.5 vs 3rd & 4.7
Kickoff140 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
ALA (top)EAST (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: ALA 100%
Closing line
ALA −51.5
Closing total
58.0
Model line
—
Actual result
EAST 0 – 56 ALA
Eastern Illinois
- PassConnor Wolf 4/8, 20 YDS
- RushCharles Kellom 14 CAR, 25 YDS
- RecLanders Green 1 REC, 15 YDS
Alabama
- PassTy Simpson 11/16, 147 YDS, 2 INT
- RushJam Miller 11 CAR, 62 YDS, 1 TD
- RecJaylen Mbakwe 2 REC, 39 YDS
28.9sper snap · slower the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
123
Points / snap
0.46
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsALA up 42 entering the 4th quarter. Across 170 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
100%
ALA went on to win
A near-lock historically
FAQ
What was the final score of Eastern Illinois vs. Alabama?
Eastern Illinois 0, Alabama 56.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (ALA) was correct.
EAST
ALA
13%
Success rate
69%
-0.48
EPA / pass
0.37
-0.28
EPA / rush
0.45
14%
Early-down success
69%
17%
Pass success
72%
11%
Rush success
67%
5%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
12%
43%
Stuffed rush rate
2%
30%
Pass rate
39%
10.5
Avg 3rd-down distance
4.7
EAST
10.5 yards to go on 3rd down
40 scrimmage snaps
ALA
4.7 yards to go on 3rd down
83 scrimmage snaps
| EAST | ALA | |
|---|---|---|
| 34 | Total yards | 539 |
| 20 | Passing yards | 270 |
| 14 | Rushing yards | 269 |
| 2 | First downs | 32 |
| 1-11 | 3rd down | 8-11 |
| 0-1 | 4th down | 1-2 |
| 4/9 | Comp/Att | 23/30 |
| 2.2 | Yards per pass | 9.0 |
| 0.5 | Yards per rush | 5.5 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 3-35 | Penalties | 4-29 |
| 21:51 | Possession | 38:09 |
EAST
6/9 with the model
−2.5 pts · −0.0% win prob
ALA
3/3 with the model
nothing given up
Costliest call
Q2 14:52 EAST punt on 4th & 1 at EAST 29. The model preferred go for it, a gap of 1.11 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishEAST 0/12 scoring drives← own end zone →ALA 8/12 scoring drives
EASTINT4 pl, 12 yds· own 25Q1
ALATD8 pl, 46 yds· opp 46Q1
EASTPUNT3 pl, -11 yds· own 13Q1
ALATD5 pl, 38 yds· opp 38Q1
EASTPUNT3 pl, 0 yds· own 25Q1
ALAMISS4 pl, 3 yds· opp 13Q1
EASTPUNT3 pl, 9 yds· own 20Q1
ALATD8 pl, 64 yds· own 36Q2
EASTPUNT5 pl, 17 yds· own 25Q2
ALAINT1 pl, 0 yds· own 21Q2
EASTDOWNS4 pl, -15 yds· opp 16Q2
ALATD9 pl, 69 yds· own 31Q2
EASTPUNT3 pl, 0 yds· own 25Q2
ALAINT4 pl, 29 yds· own 33Q2
ALATD8 pl, 59 yds· own 41Q3
EASTPUNT3 pl, -2 yds· own 25Q3
ALADOWNS11 pl, 74 yds· own 22Q3
EASTPUNT3 pl, 5 yds· own 4Q3
ALATD2 pl, 40 yds· opp 40Q3
EASTPUNT3 pl, 8 yds· own 12Q3
ALATD13 pl, 65 yds· own 35Q4
EASTPUNT3 pl, 4 yds· own 25Q4
ALATD7 pl, 53 yds· own 47Q4
EASTEND2 pl, 2 yds· own 25Q4
- Q4 1:15ALAAK Dear 5 Yd Run (Tucker Cornelius Kick)0–56
- Q4 7:34ALARichard Young 2 Yd Run (Reid Schuback Kick)0–49
- Q3 1:05ALAAustin Mack 20 Yd Run (Conor Talty Kick)0–42
- Q3 11:03ALAAK Dear 1 Yd Run (Conor Talty Kick)0–35
- Q2 1:05ALAKevin Riley 2 Yd Run (Peter Notaro Kick)0–28
- Q2 10:04ALAKevin Riley 1 Yd Run (Conor Talty Kick)0–21
- Q1 4:49ALADaniel Hill 7 Yd Run (Conor Talty Kick)0–14
- Q1 9:45ALAJam Miller 1 Yd Run (Conor Talty Kick)0–7
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →








