Skip to content
Zavion Thomas

#0Zavion Thomas

Zavion Thomas is a Versatile WR for Mississippi State. Zavion's 2023 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 58 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Zavion Thomas's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
23 Rush yards0 Rush TD12 Carries1.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
40 Receptions503 Rec yards1 Rec TD12.6 Yards/rec
Returns
6 Kick returns202 KR yards1 KR TD14 Punt returns163 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume29
  • Explosiveness37
  • Consistency74
  • Pass-Down81
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.29 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.87 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Western Michigan (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.8701.87Wk 3 vs LSU: +0.20 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs South Carolina: +0.43 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Alabama: -0.34 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Western Michigan: +1.87 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Arkansas: +0.31 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Auburn: +0.71 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Kentucky: +0.59 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Texas A&M: +0.93 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Southern Miss: +1.30 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ole Miss: +0.62 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
2vsArizonaW31-2414.1
3vsLSUL14-4119.135217.30220.20
4@South CarolinaL30-374.355611.20210.43
5vsAlabamaL17-4023.1188.006-0.34
6vsWestern MichiganW41-28-15.911515.00151.87
8@ArkansasW7-33.522311.50120.31
9@AuburnL13-277.6911212.41320.71
10vsKentuckyL3-2410.56447.30130.59
11@Texas A&ML10-5115.64399.80280.93
12vsSouthern MissW41-20-14.436622.00351.30
13vsOle MissL7-1718.468814.70260.62

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.0%
Passing plays
15.9%
Rushing plays
4.0%
Standard downs
9.2%
Passing downs
11.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.43
Passing downs
0.62
Pass / Rush EPA
0.64 / 0.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.