Skip to content
Zach Wilcke

#2Zach Wilcke

Zach Wilcke is a Volume Passer for Charlotte. Zach's 2025 season produced -8.2 total EPA across 45 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Zach Wilcke's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
33/51 Comp/Att296 Pass yards2 Pass TD3 INT64.7% Comp %
Rushing
52 Rush yards1 Rush TD19 Carries2.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume50
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch22
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 1.07 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.48 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Temple (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.4802.48Wk 6 vs South Florida: +0.10 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Army: -0.41 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Temple: +2.48 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs East Carolina: -0.66 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UTSA: -0.05 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Tulane: -0.35 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
6@South FloridaL26-5411.614/181502183.41000.10
7@ArmyL7-240.88/14420012.5-30-0.41
8vsTempleL14-49-5.15/7500085.73912.48
11@East CarolinaL22-488.01/55004.440-0.66
12vsUTSAL7-283.73/4460112.400-0.05
14@TulaneL0-276.32/33012.820-0.35

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.5%
Passing plays
24.0%
Rushing plays
10.1%
Standard downs
17.8%
Passing downs
16.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.15
Passing downs
-0.24
Pass / Rush EPA
0.00 / -0.66

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.