Skip to content
Yulkeith Brown

#5Yulkeith Brown

Yulkeith Brown is a Slot Specialist WR for Tulane. Yulkeith's 2024 season produced 28.3 total EPA across 48 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Yulkeith Brown's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
35 Receptions470 Rec yards4 Rec TD13.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume18
  • Explosiveness43
  • Consistency73
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.49 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.67 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs North Texas (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.6702.67Wk 1 vs SE Louisiana: +2.46 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kansas State: +0.90 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oklahoma: +1.26 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Louisiana: +0.18 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs South Florida: +1.93 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UAB: +0.83 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Rice: +0.67 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs North Texas: +2.67 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Charlotte: +0.75 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Temple: +0.70 EPA/play11Wk 14 vs Memphis: +0.19 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Army: -0.48 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsSE LouisianaW52-022311.51122.46
2vsKansas StateL27-3414.123115.50280.90
3@OklahomaL19-349.523115.50161.26
4@LouisianaW41-334.8177.0070.18
5vsSouth FloridaW45-10-2.335518.30251.93
6@UABW71-20-11.346015.02230.83
8vsRiceW24-10-11.433411.30190.67
9@North TexasW45-37-4.513030.01302.67
10@CharlotteW34-3-15.37537.60190.75
11vsTempleW52-6-20.322311.50140.70
14vsMemphisL24-349.649323.30420.19
15@ArmyL14-359.233010.0012-0.48
20vsFloridaL8-3313.8100.000

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.2%
Passing plays
13.0%
Rushing plays
1.8%
Standard downs
4.6%
Passing downs
9.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.36
Passing downs
0.82
Pass / Rush EPA
0.66 / 0.29

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.