Skip to content
Will Crowder

Will Crowder

QB·Troy·2026

Will Crowder is a Dual-Threat QB for Troy. Will's 2026 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 65 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

41%
projected
band 23%'25 45%59%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Will Crowder's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
26/51 Comp/Att366 Pass yards4 Pass TD0 INT51.0% Comp %
Rushing
37 Rush yards0 Rush TD14 Carries2.6 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

23
Attempts
14.0y
Avg depth
3.3y
After catch
48%
Catch rate

The ball travels 14.0 yards in the air on an average throw 6.2 yards deeper than the median. Another 3.3 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
3
0% · 0y
1
100% · 28y
4
25% · 24y
short
3
100% · 41y
3
33% · 13y
9
56% · 41y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch59
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Peak game: 0.37 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Alabama State.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3700.37Wk 1 vs Sam Houston: +0.34 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Alabama State: +0.37 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSam HoustonW24-21-21.512/24165303800.34
2vsAlabama StateW34-1714/2720110-100.37

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
47.4%
Passing plays
98.2%
Rushing plays
13.2%
Standard downs
38.7%
Passing downs
65.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.31
Passing downs
0.40
Pass / Rush EPA
0.32 / 0.51

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.