Skip to content
Wayshawn Parker

#1Wayshawn Parker

RB·Utah·2026

Wayshawn Parker is a Pass-Catching Back for Utah.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

17%
projected
band 9%'25 17%24%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Wayshawn Parker's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
124 Rush yards3 Rush TD22 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
8 Receptions88 Rec yards3 Rec TD11.0 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

8
Targets
5.0y
Avg depth
6.0y
After catch
100%
Catch rate

The ball travels 5.0 yards in the air on an average target 3.9 yards shorter than the median. Another 6.0 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
1
100% · 36y
short
3
100% · 24y
0
4
100% · 28y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume59
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving100
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.76 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Arkansas (SP+ 3).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7600.76Wk 1 vs Idaho: +0.67 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arkansas: +0.76 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsIdahoW66-1412715.9132320.67
2vsArkansasW43-103.310535.3256510.76

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
20.7%
Passing plays
14.5%
Rushing plays
25.6%
Standard downs
20.2%
Passing downs
23.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.63
Passing downs
0.98
Pass / Rush EPA
1.75 / 0.30

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.