Skip to content
Wayne Knight

#3Wayne Knight

RB·James Madison·20251.3 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Wayne Knight is a Pass-Catching Back for James Madison. Wayne's 2025 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 237 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Wayne Knight's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
1373 Rush yards9 Rush TD207 Carries6.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
40 Receptions397 Rec yards1 Rec TD9.9 Yards/rec
Returns
4 Kick returns89 KR yards0 KR TD21 Punt returns179 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume75
  • Explosiveness72
  • Consistency74
  • Receiving100
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.15 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.60 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Marshall (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6000.60Wk 1 vs Weber State: +0.49 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Louisville: -0.13 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Liberty: +0.30 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Georgia Southern: +0.46 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Georgia State: +0.03 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Louisiana: +0.01 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Old Dominion: +0.15 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Texas State: +0.36 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Marshall: +0.60 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs App State: +0.33 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Washington State: +0.47 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Coastal Carolina: -0.01 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Troy: +0.28 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsWeber StateW45-1078912.7132000.49
2@LouisvilleL14-2812.45122.403230-0.13
4@LibertyW31-13-9.017895.2132700.30
5vsGeorgia SouthernW35-10-9.4191517.9143500.46
6@Georgia StateW14-7-24.513856.5131000.03
7vsLouisianaW24-14-10.1201115.6052300.01
8vsOld DominionW63-275.912746.2122700.15
10@Texas StateW52-202.313483.7026900.36
11@MarshallW35-23-4.514876.2147910.60
12vsApp StateW58-10-11.416945.9165500.33
13vsWashington StateW24-203.8151268.410.47
14@Coastal CarolinaW59-10-15.118854.70-0.01
15vsTroyW31-14-4.82121210.1121100.28
20@OregonL34-5125.9171106.503180

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.3%
Passing plays
15.0%
Rushing plays
34.9%
Standard downs
29.2%
Passing downs
19.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.22
Passing downs
0.34
Pass / Rush EPA
0.38 / 0.21

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.670−0.20
EPA per play · 2025 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.