Skip to content
Tye Edwards

#2Tye Edwards

Tye Edwards is a Explosive Back for West Virginia.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tye Edwards's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
143 Rush yards3 Rush TD27 Carries5.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
1 Receptions-4 Rec yards0 Rec TD-4.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency83
  • Volume45
  • Explosiveness46
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving22
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (83th percentile).
  • Peak game: 0.45 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Pittsburgh (SP+ 8).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8200.82Wk 3 vs Pittsburgh: +0.45 EPA/play3Wk 6 vs BYU: -0.82 EPA/play6
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
3vsPittsburghW31-248.4251415.630.45
6@BYUL24-3815.9221.001-40-0.82

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.8%
Passing plays
1.9%
Rushing plays
23.4%
Standard downs
21.9%
Passing downs
0.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.14 / 0.31

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.