Skip to content
Tua Tagovailoa

#13Tua Tagovailoa

QB·Alabama·2019201814.7 pts line value1st Round

Tua Tagovailoa is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Alabama. Tua's 2019 season ranks in the 98th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 262 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tua Tagovailoa's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Passing
180/252 Comp/Att2840 Pass yards33 Pass TD3 INT71.4% Comp %
Rushing
17 Rush yards2 Rush TD23 Carries0.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency98
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat95
  • Consistency89
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency89th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.34 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.96 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Mississippi State (SP+ 4).

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9600.96Wk 1 vs Duke: +0.88 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs New Mexico State: +0.80 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs South Carolina: +0.83 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Southern Miss: +0.88 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ole Miss: +0.70 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Texas A&M: +0.45 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tennessee: +0.15 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs LSU: +0.47 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Mississippi State: +0.96 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsDukeW42-3-1.826/313364094.11500.88
2vsNew Mexico StateW62-10-22.016/242273095.83310.80
3@South CarolinaW47-234.828/364445095.3-1200.83
4vsSouthern MissW49-7-4.817/212935099.3800.88
5vsOle MissW59-312.926/364186094.5110.70
7@Texas A&MW47-2815.021/342934185.2-1000.45
8vsTennesseeW35-1310.811/121550175.8-500.15
11vsLSUL41-4633.121/4041841-500.47
12@Mississippi StateW38-73.514/1825620-800.96

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
46.5%
Passing plays
85.1%
Rushing plays
4.7%
Standard downs
42.5%
Passing downs
57.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.54
Passing downs
1.05
Pass / Rush EPA
0.73 / 0.38

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.410−0.292019
EPA per play · 2018 — 2019 · 22 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018Alabama
13.6
298.2
2019Alabama
14.7
271.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.