Skip to content
Tua Tagovailoa

#13Tua Tagovailoa

QB·Alabama·2019201813.6 pts line value1st Round

Tua Tagovailoa is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Alabama. Tua's 2018 season ranks in the 95th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 351 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tua Tagovailoa's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Passing
245/355 Comp/Att3966 Pass yards43 Pass TD6 INT69.0% Comp %
Rushing
190 Rush yards5 Rush TD57 Carries3.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency95
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat64
  • Consistency85
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)95th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency85th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.48 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.27 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Louisiana (SP+ -7).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4
Dillon GabrielOklahoma0.73216.1346.4
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Jayden DanielsLSU0.78317.5360.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2701.27Wk 1 vs Louisville: +0.81 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Ole Miss: +0.69 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Texas A&M: +0.89 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Louisiana: +1.27 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Arkansas: +1.22 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Missouri: +0.64 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tennessee: +0.80 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs LSU: +0.33 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Mississippi State: +0.06 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Auburn: +0.70 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Georgia: +0.07 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Oklahoma: +0.74 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Clemson: +0.74 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsLouisvilleW51-14-9.112/16227202610.81
2vsArkansas StateW57-71.213/192284098.6200
3@Ole MissW62-79.811/15191204700.69
4vsTexas A&MW45-2321.622/30387401010.89
5vsLouisianaW56-14-6.98/8128201201.27
6@ArkansasW65-314.510/1333440701.22
7vsMissouriW39-1020.812/2226530-500.64
8@TennesseeW58-215.519/293064093.7600.80
10@LSUW29-024.225/42295214910.33
11vsMississippi StateW24-023.214/2116411-2400.06
12vsThe CitadelW50-1718/223403095.1371
13vsAuburnW52-2123.625/32324502610.70
14vsGeorgiaW35-2832.910/2516412-2100.07
1vsOklahomaW45-3424.924/2731840900.74
1vsClemsonL16-4429.722/3429522-900.74

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
40.2%
Passing plays
81.8%
Rushing plays
8.5%
Standard downs
36.4%
Passing downs
51.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.37
Passing downs
0.86
Pass / Rush EPA
0.58 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.410−0.292019
EPA per play · 2018 — 2019 · 22 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018Alabama
13.6
298.2
2019Alabama
14.7
271.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.