Skip to content
Smoke Harris

#6Smoke Harris

Smoke Harris is a Versatile WR for Louisiana Tech. Smoke's 2023 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 93 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Smoke Harris's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
83 Receptions796 Rec yards4 Rec TD9.6 Yards/rec
Returns
8 Kick returns160 KR yards0 KR TD28 Punt returns234 PR yards1 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume35
  • Explosiveness17
  • Consistency72
  • Pass-Down81
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency72th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.14 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.51 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs North Texas (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Zach AbeyNavy0.3700.825.9
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5101.51Wk 1 vs SMU: +0.29 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Northwestern State: +0.21 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs North Texas: +1.51 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Nebraska: +0.17 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UTEP: -0.11 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Western Kentucky: +0.68 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.72 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs New Mexico State: +0.84 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Liberty: +0.63 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Sam Houston: -0.16 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Jacksonville State: +0.58 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
0vsFlorida InternationalW22-17-21.21115514.1164
1@SMUL14-3810.17476.70220.29
2vsNorthwestern StateW51-21294.50130.21
3vsNorth TexasL37-40-6.747719.32361.51
4@NebraskaL14-280.310737.30350.17
5@UTEPW24-10-16.2372.304-0.11
6vsWestern KentuckyL28-35-2.01111710.60350.68
7@Middle TennesseeL23-31-9.51112911.70230.72
9vsNew Mexico StateL24-27-1.83237.7090.84
10@LibertyL30-568.057314.61420.63
11vsSam HoustonL27-42-13.87253.609-0.16
12@Jacksonville StateL17-56-1.69616.80170.58

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.3%
Passing plays
20.4%
Rushing plays
2.8%
Standard downs
11.7%
Passing downs
13.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.42
Passing downs
0.60
Pass / Rush EPA
0.62 / -0.61

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.