Skip to content
Simeon Evans

#3Simeon Evans

Simeon Evans is a Versatile WR for Sam Houston. Simeon's 2024 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 55 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Simeon Evans's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
50 Receptions559 Rec yards6 Rec TD11.2 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Punt returns-6 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume19
  • Explosiveness28
  • Consistency70
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 1.35 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 3.28 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs UCF (SP+ 3).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.2803.28Wk 1 vs Rice: +2.80 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UCF: +3.28 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Hawai'i: +1.93 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Texas State: +0.71 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UTEP: +0.19 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Western Kentucky: +0.72 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Florida International: +0.22 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.73 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Kennesaw State: +0.90 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Jacksonville State: -0.30 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Liberty: +0.62 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@RiceW34-14-11.42168.00132.80
2@UCFL14-452.838929.71643.28
3vsHawai'iW31-13-10.911010.00101.93
4vsNew Mexico StateW31-11-19.03279.0120
5vsTexas StateW40-395.4177.0070.71
6@UTEPW41-21-22.74256.30110.19
8vsWestern KentuckyL14-31-2.255911.81370.72
9vsFlorida InternationalW10-7-12.15357.00120.22
10vsLouisiana TechW9-3-11.644310.80220.73
12@Kennesaw StateW23-17-25.156412.80320.90
13@Jacksonville StateL11-21-1.04164.0016-0.30
14vsLibertyW20-180.268313.82320.62
20vsGeorgia SouthernW31-26-1.778512.1133

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.7%
Passing plays
14.5%
Rushing plays
1.1%
Standard downs
5.8%
Passing downs
8.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.52
Passing downs
0.88
Pass / Rush EPA
0.74 / -0.05

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.