Skip to content
Sean Tucker

#34Sean Tucker

RB·Syracuse·20212.7 pts line value

Sean Tucker is a Featured Back for Syracuse. Sean's 2021 season ranks in the 18th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 249 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sean Tucker's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Rushing
1496 Rush yards12 Rush TD246 Carries6.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
20 Receptions255 Rec yards2 Rec TD12.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency18
  • Volume98
  • Explosiveness62
  • Consistency57
  • Receiving42
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)18th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency57th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.19 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.36 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs UAlbany.

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.3601.36Wk 1 vs Ohio: +0.41 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Rutgers: -0.06 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UAlbany: +1.36 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Liberty: +0.28 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Florida State: -0.21 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Wake Forest: +0.41 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Clemson: +0.04 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Virginia Tech: +0.50 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Boston College: +0.22 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Louisville: +0.04 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs NC State: +0.25 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Pittsburgh: -0.01 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@OhioW29-9-11.6251817.210.41
2vsRutgersL7-17-3.013544.214270-0.06
3vsUAlbanyW62-241313210.24312111.36
4vsLibertyW24-218.4321695.3122700.28
5@Florida StateL30-337.6241024.30-0.21
6vsWake ForestL37-4010.1261535.9232910.41
7vsClemsonL14-1718.7221577.1022000.04
8@Virginia TechW41-362.4201125.6121400.50
9vsBoston CollegeW21-60.9262078.010.22
11@LouisvilleL3-417.819955.001100.04
12@NC StateL17-4116.1131058.111-200.25
13vsPittsburghL14-3117.613292.202180-0.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
34.3%
Passing plays
7.9%
Rushing plays
52.3%
Standard downs
43.6%
Passing downs
16.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.96
Pass / Rush EPA
0.92 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.520−0.37
EPA per play · 2021 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.