#15Scotty Fox Jr.

QB·West Virginia·2025

Scotty Fox Jr. is a Clutch Passer for West Virginia. Scotty's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 237 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Scotty Fox Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing

101/170 Comp/Att1276 Pass yards7 Pass TD6 INT59.4% Comp %

Rushing

201 Rush yards3 Rush TD84 Carries2.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Efficiency0
Volume100
Dual-Threat29
Consistency31
Clutch74

Player type

Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency31th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.27 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 1.93 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Robert Morris.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	vsRobert Morris	W45-3	—	1/1	8	0	0	100.0	63	1	1.93
3	vsPittsburgh	W31-24	8.4	1/4	56	0	2	1.0	2	0	0.12
5	vsUtah	L14-48	22.2	—	—	—	—	—	5	0	-0.54
6	@BYU	L24-38	15.9	3/3	54	1	0	99.9	22	0	1.10
8	@UCF	L13-45	-1.2	6/17	47	0	0	3.5	2	0	-0.40
9	vsTCU	L17-23	8.3	28/41	301	2	0	41.0	-14	0	0.13
10	@Houston	W45-35	7.4	13/22	157	1	0	95.2	65	2	0.47
11	vsColorado	W29-22	-8.3	17/28	202	1	2	45.4	58	0	0.22
12	@Arizona State	L23-25	3.9	19/31	353	2	1	63.5	7	0	0.29
14	vsTexas Tech	L0-49	27.6	13/23	98	0	1	9.5	-9	0	-0.28

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

35.3%

Passing plays

64.4%

Rushing plays

16.4%

Standard downs

28.3%

Passing downs

52.1%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.08
Passing downs: 0.25
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.23 / 0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).