Skip to content
Rocko Griffin

#24Rocko Griffin

Rocko Griffin is a Committee Back for Massachusetts.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Rocko Griffin's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
245 Rush yards2 Rush TD53 Carries4.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
10 Receptions61 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume34
  • Explosiveness32
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving54
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.11 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Bowling Green (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1101.11Wk 1 vs Temple: +0.47 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Bryant: -0.44 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Iowa: -0.21 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Missouri: +0.43 EPA/play5Wk 9 vs Central Michigan: +0.24 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Akron: +0.09 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Northern Illinois: -0.54 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ohio: -0.28 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Bowling Green: +1.11 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsTempleL10-42-5.110949.410.47
2vsBryantL26-2710202.001-10-0.44
3@IowaL7-4719.710282.80290-0.21
5@MissouriL6-4214.45234.600.43
9@Central MichiganL13-38-8.87568.0142700.24
11@AkronL10-44-13.93-5-1.7011800.09
12vsNorthern IllinoisL3-45-16.7351.70-0.54
13@OhioL14-42-4.02-2-1.00280-0.28
14vsBowling GreenL14-45-12.63268.701.11

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.8%
Passing plays
3.5%
Rushing plays
24.0%
Standard downs
13.8%
Passing downs
8.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.05
Passing downs
0.15
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.01 / 0.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.