Skip to content
Robert Henry

Robert Henry

RB·UTSA·20252.3 pts line value

Robert Henry is a Explosive Back for UTSA. Robert's 2025 season ranks in the 78th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 167 plays — a above-average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Robert Henry's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
1045 Rush yards9 Rush TD151 Carries6.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
18 Receptions114 Rec yards2 Rec TD6.3 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns0 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency78
  • Volume68
  • Explosiveness78
  • Consistency47
  • Receiving48
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)78th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency47th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (78th percentile).
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.53 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.66 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Texas A&M (SP+ 21).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6600.66Wk 1 vs Texas A&M: +0.66 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas State: +0.58 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Incarnate Word: +0.47 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Colorado State: +0.44 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Temple: +0.00 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Rice: +0.29 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs North Texas: +0.00 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Tulane: -0.14 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs South Florida: -0.10 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Charlotte: -0.31 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Army: +0.04 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Texas A&ML24-4220.71617711.123-900.66
2vsTexas StateL36-432.3171599.4242110.58
3vsIncarnate WordW48-201414410.322800.47
4@Colorado StateW17-16-15.6211446.9127610.44
6@TempleL21-27-5.112423.503900.00
7vsRiceW61-13-14.812645.310.29
8@North TexasL17-5513.81213811.510.00
10vsTulaneW48-266.316875.40140-0.14
11@South FloridaL23-5511.610272.70230-0.10
12@CharlotteW28-7-26.7810.10-0.31
14vsArmyL24-270.813624.801200.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.8%
Passing plays
6.3%
Rushing plays
44.0%
Standard downs
23.6%
Passing downs
24.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.11
Passing downs
0.53
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.760−0.40
EPA per play · 2025 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.