Skip to content
Rickie Collins

#1Rickie Collins

Rickie Collins is a Dual-Threat QB for Syracuse. Rickie's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 183 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Rickie Collins's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
97/181 Comp/Att1042 Pass yards6 Pass TD10 INT53.6% Comp %
Rushing
126 Rush yards1 Rush TD54 Carries2.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency67
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency67th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3400.34Wk 3 vs Colgate: +0.34 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Clemson: +0.10 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Duke: +0.03 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs SMU: +0.09 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Pittsburgh: +0.20 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Georgia Tech: +0.26 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Miami: -0.12 EPA/play11
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
3vsColgateW66-244/6651164.11900.34
4@ClemsonW34-219.53/8341020.4-800.10
5vsDukeL3-386.624/372290120.1-800.03
6@SMUL18-3113.422/452791337.75710.09
8vsPittsburghL13-308.415/311262326.54200.20
9@Georgia TechL16-419.317/292241036.14100.26
11@MiamiL10-3820.712/25850222.7-170-0.12

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
47.4%
Passing plays
73.3%
Rushing plays
17.4%
Standard downs
34.9%
Passing downs
71.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.07
Passing downs
0.27
Pass / Rush EPA
0.05 / 0.44

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.