Skip to content
Raleek Brown

#0Raleek Brown

Raleek Brown is a Pass-Catching Back for Texas.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Raleek Brown's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
88 Rush yards2 Rush TD21 Carries4.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
5 Receptions12 Rec yards0 Rec TD2.4 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

7
Targets
-2.9y
Avg depth
5.6y
After catch
71%
Catch rate

The ball travels -2.9 yards in the air on an average target 11.8 yards shorter than the median. Another 5.6 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
0
short
2
50% · -4y
1
0% · 0y
4
100% · 16y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume54
  • Explosiveness24
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving82
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.1200.12Wk 1 vs Texas State: +0.12 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Ohio State: +0.01 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsTexas StateW59-7-7.811343.1211100.12
2vsOhio StateW24-2330.010545.404100.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
18.9%
Passing plays
8.5%
Rushing plays
29.3%
Standard downs
19.6%
Passing downs
17.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.08
Passing downs
0.07
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.21 / 0.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.620−0.39
EPA per play · 2025 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.