Skip to content
Quinshon Judkins
Quinshon Judkins

#1Quinshon Judkins

RB·Ole Miss·2024202320224.6 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Quinshon Judkins is a 3-year Featured Back for Ole Miss. Quinshon's 2022 season ranks in the 55th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 278 plays — a average rate for the RB. Quinshon's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Quinshon Judkins's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2022

3-Star · Developmental
Stars
247 composite
0.8804
National rank
#562
High school
Pike Road
Hometown
Pike Road, AL

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2022 Production

Rushing
1567 Rush yards16 Rush TD274 Carries5.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
15 Receptions132 Rec yards1 Rec TD8.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency55
  • Volume84
  • Explosiveness54
  • Consistency78
  • Receiving30
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)55th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.27 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.68 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Vanderbilt (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Royce FreemanOregon0.3605.199.0
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6800.68Wk 1 vs Troy: +0.53 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Central Arkansas: +0.65 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia Tech: +0.46 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Tulsa: +0.07 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kentucky: +0.39 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Vanderbilt: +0.68 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Auburn: +0.29 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs LSU: +0.22 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas A&M: +0.12 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Alabama: +0.32 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Arkansas: +0.55 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Mississippi State: +0.14 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Texas Tech: -0.19 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsTroyW28-108.114876.2111800.53
2vsCentral ArkansasW59-31010410.400.65
3@Georgia TechW42-0-11.819985.220.46
4vsTulsaW35-27-6.1271405.221500.07
5vsKentuckyW22-1913.0151067.1111400.39
6@VanderbiltW52-28-4.711464.2211400.68
7vsAuburnW48-345.1251395.621710.29
8@LSUL20-4516.2251114.4221300.22
9@Texas A&MW31-289.1342056.010.12
11vsAlabamaL24-3030.3251355.4231400.32
12@ArkansasL27-4212.0242148.9122700.55
13vsMississippi StateL22-2415.422914.101400.14
1vsTexas TechL25-428.523914.002160-0.19

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
29.4%
Passing plays
4.8%
Rushing plays
45.9%
Standard downs
33.2%
Passing downs
20.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.25
Passing downs
0.25
Pass / Rush EPA
0.72 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.500−0.5320232024
EPA per play · 2022 — 2024 · 42 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2022Ole Miss
4.6
90.2
2023Ole Miss
1.5
48.6
2024Ohio State
3.3
79.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.