Skip to content
Noah Jennings

#13Noah Jennings

Noah Jennings is a Versatile WR for Cincinnati. Noah's 2025 season produced 14.5 total EPA across 37 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Noah Jennings's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
23 Receptions323 Rec yards0 Rec TD14.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume17
  • Explosiveness47
  • Consistency61
  • Pass-Down75
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency61th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.20 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.85 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Baylor (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3700.615.2
Micah DavisAir Force0.3700.616.3
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Cade HarrisAir Force0.3300.514.8
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3200.412.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.8501.85Wk 2 vs Bowling Green: +0.36 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Northwestern State: +0.31 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Kansas: +1.11 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Iowa State: +0.21 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UCF: -0.25 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Oklahoma State: +1.52 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Baylor: +1.85 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Utah: +0.21 EPA/play10Wk 13 vs BYU: -0.46 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs TCU: +0.58 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
2vsBowling GreenW34-20-12.622814.00170.36
3vsNorthwestern StateW70-02157.50120.31
5@KansasW37-344.133612.00181.11
6vsIowa StateW38-309.924221.00360.21
7vsUCFW20-11-1.211212.0012-0.25
8@Oklahoma StateW49-17-15.136321.00331.52
9vsBaylorW41-201.422311.50131.85
10@UtahL14-4522.23289.30100.21
13vsBYUL14-2615.922914.5020-0.46
14@TCUL23-458.324221.00240.58
20vsNavyL13-356.2155.005

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.0%
Passing plays
12.7%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
5.2%
Passing downs
7.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.34
Passing downs
0.49
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.