#1Nitro Tuggle

WR·Purdue·2025

Nitro Tuggle is a Versatile WR for Purdue. Nitro's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 53 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.47
Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
Total EPA (value)0.45
Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Nitro Tuggle's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving

34 Receptions505 Rec yards4 Rec TD14.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

Efficiency100
Volume25
Explosiveness52
Consistency59
Pass-Down65

Player type

Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency59th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.57 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 1.60 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs USC (SP+ 17).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Cade Harris	Air Force	2024	45	0.330	0.5	14.8
Keytaon Thompson	Virginia	2020	39	0.320	0.4	12.5
Micah Davis	Air Force	2021	44	0.370	0.6	16.3
Ainias Smith	Texas A&M	2020	55	0.310	0.5	17.0
Keytaon Thompson	Virginia	2021	41	0.370	0.6	15.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsBall State	W31-0	-23.0	3	32	10.7	0	19	1.12
2	vsSouthern Illinois	W34-17	—	1	29	29.0	1	29	0.81
3	vsUSC	L17-33	16.9	4	69	17.3	1	33	1.60
4	@Notre Dame	L30-56	24.4	3	66	22.0	1	31	0.30
6	vsIllinois	L27-43	12.9	2	33	16.5	0	27	-0.21
7	@Minnesota	L20-27	1.5	3	58	19.3	0	27	0.68
8	@Northwestern	L0-19	5.8	1	8	8.0	0	8	-0.54
9	vsRutgers	L24-27	1.0	2	20	10.0	1	14	0.57
10	@Michigan	L16-21	12.4	5	38	7.6	0	16	0.77
11	vsOhio State	L10-34	30.1	2	15	7.5	0	8	-0.17
12	@Washington	L13-49	18.4	3	57	19.0	0	36	-0.10
14	vsIndiana	L3-56	32.4	5	80	16.0	0	23	0.37

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

8.9%

Passing plays

16.9%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

7.9%

Passing downs

11.0%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.31
Passing downs: 0.40
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.35 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).