Skip to content
Na'eem Abdul-Rahim Gladding
Na'eem Abdul-Rahim Gladding

#1Na'eem Abdul-Rahim Gladding

Na'eem Abdul-Rahim Gladding is a Slot Specialist WR for Old Dominion. Na'eem's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 82 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Na'eem Abdul-Rahim Gladding's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
51 Receptions667 Rec yards6 Rec TD13.1 Yards/rec
Returns
4 Punt returns33 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume27
  • Explosiveness41
  • Consistency77
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.90 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.97 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs North Carolina Central.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.9701.97Wk 1 vs Indiana: +1.07 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Carolina Central: +1.97 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Virginia Tech: +1.49 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Liberty: +1.00 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Coastal Carolina: +1.01 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Marshall: +0.34 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs James Madison: +0.99 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs App State: +0.35 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UL Monroe: -0.01 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Troy: +0.11 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia Southern: +0.62 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Georgia State: +0.16 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@IndianaL14-2732.44358.80181.07
2vsNorth Carolina CentralW54-633411.31151.97
3@Virginia TechW45-26-10.137123.71441.49
5vsLibertyW21-7-9.055410.80201.00
6vsCoastal CarolinaW47-7-15.1710114.43281.01
7@MarshallL24-48-4.537123.70460.34
8@James MadisonL27-6312.35479.40230.99
9vsApp StateW24-21-11.4810513.11190.35
10@UL MonroeW31-6-21.623316.5025-0.01
12vsTroyW33-0-4.8166.0060.11
13@Georgia SouthernW45-10-9.44358.80140.62
14vsGeorgia StateW27-10-24.511515.00150.16
20vsSouth FloridaW24-1011.656012.0028

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.4%
Passing plays
24.1%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
8.0%
Passing downs
12.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.41
Passing downs
0.92
Pass / Rush EPA
0.61 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.