Skip to content
Myles Montgomery
Myles Montgomery

#22Myles Montgomery

RB·UCF·2025

Myles Montgomery is a Committee Back for UCF. Myles's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 167 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Myles Montgomery's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
705 Rush yards4 Rush TD143 Carries4.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
17 Receptions182 Rec yards0 Rec TD10.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume67
  • Explosiveness38
  • Consistency17
  • Receiving56
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency17th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.12 EPA/play decline from first to second half.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3300.33Wk 1 vs Jacksonville State: +0.08 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Carolina A&T: +0.02 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs North Carolina: +0.08 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kansas State: +0.21 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Kansas: +0.12 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Cincinnati: +0.12 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs West Virginia: -0.33 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Baylor: +0.15 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Houston: -0.03 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Oklahoma State: +0.05 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs BYU: +0.05 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsJacksonville StateW17-10-6.721793.8037100.08
2vsNorth Carolina A&TW68-78354.4013200.02
4vsNorth CarolinaW34-9-6.612352.912100.08
5@Kansas StateL20-347.01011911.901300.21
6vsKansasL20-274.1221105.022500.12
7@CincinnatiL11-204.513564.301500.12
8vsWest VirginiaW45-13-6.814886.302110-0.33
10@BaylorL3-301.412504.2022300.15
11vsHoustonL27-307.46233.81-0.03
13vsOklahoma StateW17-14-15.118814.5012000.05
14@BYUL21-4115.97294.1021100.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.3%
Passing plays
7.2%
Rushing plays
41.2%
Standard downs
27.0%
Passing downs
15.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.09
Passing downs
-0.03
Pass / Rush EPA
0.09 / 0.05

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.