Skip to content
Mitch Griffis

#12Mitch Griffis

Mitch Griffis is a Efficient Passer for Texas Tech.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Mitch Griffis's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
26/36 Comp/Att357 Pass yards2 Pass TD0 INT72.2% Comp %
Rushing
29 Rush yards1 Rush TD14 Carries2.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency90
  • Volume38
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency81
  • Clutch0
Player type
Efficient Passer

Maximises EPA per play through accuracy, decision-making, and getting the ball to the right place.

Elite EPA per playLow-turnover profileDecision-making
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)90th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 1.05 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0501.05Wk 1 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff: +1.05 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kent State: +0.89 EPA/play2Wk 9 vs Oklahoma State: +0.50 EPA/play9Wk 12 vs UCF: +0.41 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs West Virginia: +0.02 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsArkansas-Pine BluffW67-72/3211098.1801.05
2vsKent StateW62-14-19.32/2190083.91300.89
9vsOklahoma StateW42-0-15.19/131721028.7-710.50
12vsUCFW48-9-1.213/171450089.81000.41
14@West VirginiaW49-0-6.80/100010.4500.02

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.4%
Passing plays
22.5%
Rushing plays
5.6%
Standard downs
11.7%
Passing downs
16.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.62
Passing downs
0.03
Pass / Rush EPA
0.71 / -0.42

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.