Skip to content
Mike Bercovici

#2Mike Bercovici

QB·Arizona State·20157.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Mike Bercovici is a Clutch Passer for Arizona State. Mike's 2015 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 608 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Mike Bercovici's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Passing
319/532 Comp/Att3860 Pass yards30 Pass TD9 INT60.0% Comp %
Rushing
84 Rush yards6 Rush TD109 Carries0.8 Yards/carry
Punting
3 Punts107 Punt yards35.7 Yards/punt38 Long0 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat36
  • Consistency75
  • Clutch95
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.57 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Colorado (SP+ -4).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Casey ThompsonNebraska0.52812.6351.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5700.57Wk 1 vs Texas A&M: -0.03 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Cal Poly: +0.37 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs New Mexico: +0.49 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs USC: +0.07 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UCLA: +0.30 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Colorado: +0.57 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Utah: +0.02 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Oregon: +0.19 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Washington State: -0.08 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Washington: +0.16 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Arizona: +0.35 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs California: +0.55 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs West Virginia: +0.35 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsTexas A&ML17-3814.125/411991033.301-0.03
2vsCal PolyW35-2123/352833184.7-1000.37
3vsNew MexicoW34-10-8.722/373173077.11510.49
4vsUSCL14-4216.823/442720113.3-2000.07
5@UCLAW38-2318.627/442732166.73710.30
6vsColoradoW48-23-4.020/312605188.74000.57
7@UtahL18-3411.020/412420123.4-3700.02
9vsOregonL55-6115.932/533985272.05810.19
10@Washington StateL24-384.228/452350144.3-21-0.08
11vsWashingtonW27-179.722/342531035.4-1000.16
12vsArizonaW52-374.721/323152175.0310.35
13@CaliforniaL46-4812.127/433954081.2000.55
1vsWest VirginiaL42-4312.929/524184065.11000.35

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
58.2%
Passing plays
98.9%
Rushing plays
15.5%
Standard downs
51.1%
Passing downs
73.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.41
Pass / Rush EPA
0.27 / 0.08

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.640−0.15
EPA per play · 2015 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.