Skip to content
Micah Davis

#6Micah Davis

Micah Davis is a Slot Specialist WR for Southern Miss. Micah's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 51 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Micah Davis's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
31 Receptions429 Rec yards5 Rec TD13.8 Yards/rec
Returns
13 Kick returns271 KR yards0 KR TD6 Punt returns64 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume16
  • Explosiveness46
  • Consistency52
  • Pass-Down97
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency52th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.13 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.41 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Louisiana (SP+ -10).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Tyler BuchnerNotre Dame0.2500.312.8
Samajie GrantArizona0.2500.315.5
Justin LynchTemple0.2400.315.1
Brandon ChatmanNavy0.2300.612.0
Xavier WhiteTexas Tech0.3000.518.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.4101.41Wk 1 vs Mississippi State: +0.49 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Jackson State: +0.90 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs App State: +0.72 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.06 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Jacksonville State: +0.48 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Georgia Southern: -0.56 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Louisiana: +1.41 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs UL Monroe: -0.63 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Arkansas State: +0.32 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Texas State: -0.11 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Alabama: +1.39 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsMississippi StateL17-344.1263.0130.49
2vsJackson StateW38-2033812.71150.90
3vsApp StateW38-22-11.433010.01210.72
4@Louisiana TechL20-30-1.33289.30200.06
5vsJacksonville StateW42-25-6.723417.00300.48
7@Georgia SouthernW38-35-9.42157.5014-0.56
8@LouisianaW22-10-10.1313444.71981.41
9vsUL MonroeW49-21-21.6111.001-0.63
11@Arkansas StateW27-21-8.85448.80120.32
12vsTexas StateL14-412.3242.006-0.11
13@South AlabamaL35-42-12.725929.51301.39
20vsWestern KentuckyL16-271.633612.0020

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.7%
Passing plays
10.9%
Rushing plays
0.5%
Standard downs
4.4%
Passing downs
8.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.12
Passing downs
0.40
Pass / Rush EPA
0.27 / -0.15

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.410−0.40
EPA per play · 2021 · 7 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.