Skip to content
Micah Alejado

#12Micah Alejado

QB·Hawai'i·20254.6 pts line value

Micah Alejado is a Clutch Passer for Hawai'i. Micah's 2025 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 483 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Micah Alejado's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
285/430 Comp/Att3106 Pass yards24 Pass TD9 INT66.3% Comp %
Rushing
105 Rush yards1 Rush TD81 Carries1.3 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

90
Attempts
7.2y
Avg depth
4.7y
After catch
52%
Catch rate

The ball travels 7.2 yards in the air on an average throw 0.6 yards shorter than the median. Another 4.7 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
0% · 0y
3
33% · 24y
1
0% · 0y
short
38
50% · 137y
19
63% · 158y
28
54% · 136y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat34
  • Consistency84
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.62 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Air Force (SP+ -3).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6200.62Wk 1 vs Arizona: +0.22 EPA/play1Wk 4 vs Fresno State: +0.07 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Air Force: +0.62 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Utah State: +0.27 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Colorado State: +0.33 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs San José State: +0.47 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs San Diego State: +0.39 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs UNLV: +0.07 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wyoming: +0.42 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
0vsStanfordW23-20-11.827/392102048.3360
1@ArizonaL6-4012.018/311570128.3-1600.22
4vsFresno StateL21-231.828/472191320.83100.07
5@Air ForceW44-35-3.235/474573077.9600.62
7vsUtah StateW44-26-3.134/544133150.7-410.27
8@Colorado StateW31-19-15.626/383013166.62100.33
10@San José StateL38-45-14.331/463673066.0400.47
11vsSan Diego StateW38-66.722/342563170.6-1000.39
13@UNLVL10-384.315/241631132.0-200.07
14vsWyomingW27-7-11.317/242892171.6600.42
20vsCaliforniaW35-31-3.232/462743077.6330

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
64.4%
Passing plays
92.6%
Rushing plays
19.9%
Standard downs
58.1%
Passing downs
77.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.64
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / 0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.68+0.01
EPA per play · 2025 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.