Skip to content
Marteze Waller

#33Marteze Waller

RB·Fresno State·20142.1 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Marteze Waller is a Committee Back for Fresno State. Marteze's 2014 season ranks in the 10th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 251 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Marteze Waller's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Rushing
1368 Rush yards11 Rush TD225 Carries6.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
27 Receptions120 Rec yards0 Rec TD4.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency10
  • Volume67
  • Explosiveness62
  • Consistency35
  • Receiving49
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)10th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency35th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.10 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.67 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Nevada (SP+ -7).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6700.67Wk 1 vs USC: +0.36 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Utah: -0.18 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Nebraska: -0.35 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Southern Utah: +0.33 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs New Mexico: +0.26 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs San Diego State: +0.02 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UNLV: +0.18 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Boise State: +0.43 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Wyoming: +0.13 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs San José State: +0.27 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Nevada: +0.67 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Hawai'i: +0.28 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Boise State: -0.41 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Rice: -0.07 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@USCL13-5217.116976.1232500.36
2@UtahL27-598.815614.10360-0.18
3vsNebraskaL19-5513.17192.70200-0.35
4vsSouthern UtahW56-16161177.311100.33
5@New MexicoW35-24-15.0191638.6022500.26
6vsSan Diego StateW24-131.016674.213300.02
7@UNLVL27-30-17.6171378.1143800.18
8@Boise StateL27-3711.6181649.1231200.43
10vsWyomingL17-45-14.0181166.412200.13
11vsSan José StateW38-24-11.5221456.610.27
13@NevadaW40-20-7.36467.700.67
14vsHawai'iW28-21-15.0251375.522500.28
15@Boise StateL14-2811.615231.50130-0.41
1vsRiceL6-30-3.115765.10100-0.07

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.6%
Passing plays
6.3%
Rushing plays
42.9%
Standard downs
27.7%
Passing downs
16.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.18
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.22 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.780−0.52
EPA per play · 2014 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.