Skip to content
Malachi Thomas

#24Malachi Thomas

Malachi Thomas is a Pass-Catching Back for Purdue. Malachi's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 62 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Malachi Thomas's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
243 Rush yards0 Rush TD53 Carries4.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
11 Receptions99 Rec yards2 Rec TD9.0 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns40 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume27
  • Explosiveness32
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving74
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.14 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.27 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Illinois (SP+ 13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2701.27Wk 1 vs Ball State: -0.92 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Southern Illinois: -0.18 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs USC: -0.15 EPA/play3Wk 6 vs Illinois: +1.27 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Minnesota: -0.16 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Northwestern: +0.07 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Rutgers: +1.18 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Michigan: +0.22 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Ohio State: -0.21 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Washington: -0.25 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Indiana: -0.35 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsBall StateW31-0-23.0221.00-0.92
2vsSouthern IllinoisW34-176142.301100-0.18
3vsUSCL17-3316.9252.50-0.15
6vsIllinoisL27-4312.922901.27
7@MinnesotaL20-271.54215.30150-0.16
8@NorthwesternL0-195.87344.900.07
9vsRutgersL24-271.036220.7035011.18
10@MichiganL16-2112.415684.502-110.22
11vsOhio StateL10-3430.14153.80-0.21
12@WashingtonL13-4918.46162.70-0.25
14vsIndianaL3-5632.4461.50260-0.35

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.3%
Passing plays
3.8%
Rushing plays
15.8%
Standard downs
10.3%
Passing downs
7.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.18
Pass / Rush EPA
0.56 / -0.02

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.