Skip to content
Leon Allen

#33Leon Allen

RB·Western Kentucky·20143.2 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Leon Allen is a Featured Back for Western Kentucky. Leon's 2014 season ranks in the 10th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 323 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Leon Allen's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Rushing
1542 Rush yards13 Rush TD272 Carries5.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
51 Receptions476 Rec yards3 Rec TD9.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency10
  • Volume95
  • Explosiveness54
  • Consistency70
  • Receiving55
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)10th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.14 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.68 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Army (SP+ -17).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6800.68Wk 1 vs Bowling Green: +0.18 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Illinois: +0.19 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Middle Tennessee: -0.12 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Navy: +0.26 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UAB: -0.10 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.56 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Old Dominion: +0.36 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Louisiana Tech: -0.17 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UTEP: +0.26 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Army: +0.68 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UTSA: +0.31 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Marshall: +0.33 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Central Michigan: +0.41 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsBowling GreenW59-31-5.427993.7165300.18
2@IllinoisL34-420.4241184.9165600.19
3@Middle TennesseeL47-50-8.7301284.31480-0.12
5@NavyW36-273.4171026.0065800.26
6vsUABL39-42-4.29293.20190-0.10
8@Florida AtlanticL38-45-10.412584.821-100.56
9vsOld DominionW66-51-12.7321825.7223100.36
10@Louisiana TechL10-59-1.714765.40210-0.17
11vsUTEPW35-27-12.014483.4188810.26
12vsArmyW52-24-16.93334510.5321200.68
13vsUTSAW45-7-3.414684.9036510.31
14@MarshallW67-6616.8332377.2155110.33
1vsCentral MichiganW49-48-5.213524.0154500.41

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
33.1%
Passing plays
10.0%
Rushing plays
65.9%
Standard downs
39.3%
Passing downs
17.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.64
Pass / Rush EPA
0.52 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.760−0.26
EPA per play · 2014 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.