Skip to content
Le'Veon Moss

#8Le'Veon Moss

Le'Veon Moss is a Committee Back for Texas A&M. Le'Veon's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 84 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Le'Veon Moss's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
404 Rush yards6 Rush TD77 Carries5.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
2 Receptions3 Rec yards0 Rec TD1.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume49
  • Explosiveness44
  • Consistency53
  • Receiving23
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency53th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Peak game: 0.76 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Florida (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7600.76Wk 1 vs UTSA: +0.08 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Utah State: +0.43 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Notre Dame: +0.29 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Auburn: -0.08 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Mississippi State: -0.23 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Florida: +0.76 EPA/play7
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUTSAW42-243.73196.301-200.08
2vsUtah StateW44-22-3.110686.810.43
3@Notre DameW41-4024.420814.130.29
5vsAuburnW16-1011.6211396.61-0.08
6vsMississippi StateW31-94.111363.30-0.23
7vsFloridaW34-173.55469.210.76
20vsMiamiL3-1020.77152.10150

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.1%
Passing plays
2.2%
Rushing plays
29.8%
Standard downs
20.7%
Passing downs
8.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
-0.02
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.60 / 0.16

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.