#18Kenny Odom

WR·UTEP·2025

Kenny Odom is a Versatile WR for UTEP. Kenny's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 97 plays — a developing rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.47
Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
Total EPA (value)0.45
Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kenny Odom's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

57 Rush yards0 Rush TD13 Carries4.4 Yards/carry

Receiving

62 Receptions582 Rec yards6 Rec TD9.4 Yards/rec

Returns

1 Kick returns16 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

Efficiency0
Volume41
Explosiveness16
Consistency0
Pass-Down100

Player type

Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs WR peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.35 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 1.32 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs UT Martin.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
De'Michael Harris	Southern Miss	2019	117	0.130	0.7	15.2
Hyleck Foster	Marshall	2015	101	0.180	0.5	18.2
Amare Jones	Tulane	2020	71	0.180	0.0	12.8
Davis Bryson	Kennesaw State	2024	97	0.200	0.0	19.4
Shai Werts	Georgia Southern	2017	161	0.150	0.0	24.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	@Utah State	L16-28	-3.1	9	97	10.8	1	34	0.26
2	vsUT Martin	W42-17	—	5	124	24.8	1	74	1.32
3	@Texas	L10-27	16.2	5	15	3.0	0	5	-0.10
5	vsLouisiana Tech	L11-30	-1.3	4	11	2.8	0	6	-0.19
7	vsLiberty	L8-19	-9.0	3	53	17.7	0	44	-0.47
8	vsSam Houston	W35-17	-27.8	10	67	6.7	1	26	0.30
10	@Kennesaw State	L20-33	-5.4	6	51	8.5	1	27	0.33
11	vsJacksonville State	L27-30	-6.7	4	24	6.0	0	11	-0.63
12	@Missouri State	L24-38	-10.7	1	-2	-2.0	0	0	-0.41
13	vsNew Mexico State	L31-34	-15.5	8	48	6.0	1	28	-0.11
14	@Delaware	L31-61	-10.9	7	94	13.4	1	49	-0.15

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

14.2%

Passing plays

23.5%

Rushing plays

4.1%

Standard downs

12.9%

Passing downs

16.9%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: -0.18
Passing downs: 0.39
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.06 / -0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).