Skip to content
Kejon Owens

#5Kejon Owens

Kejon Owens is a Featured Back for Florida International. Kejon's 2025 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 225 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kejon Owens's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
1334 Rush yards11 Rush TD213 Carries6.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
18 Receptions67 Rec yards0 Rec TD3.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume73
  • Explosiveness66
  • Consistency56
  • Receiving36
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency56th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.17 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.85 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Bethune-Cookman.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8500.85Wk 1 vs Bethune-Cookman: +0.85 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Penn State: +0.15 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.48 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Delaware: -0.12 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs UConn: +0.02 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Western Kentucky: +0.31 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Kennesaw State: -0.01 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Missouri State: -0.17 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.29 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Liberty: +0.00 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Jacksonville State: +0.30 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Sam Houston: +0.12 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsBethune-CookmanW42-911716.521600.85
2@Penn StateL0-3418.115785.200.15
3vsFlorida AtlanticW38-28-8.7191739.1231900.48
4vsDelawareL16-38-10.915744.90-0.12
6@UConnL10-515.116674.2141000.02
8@Western KentuckyW25-61.6221958.912700.31
9vsKennesaw StateL26-45-5.4201668.31230-0.01
10@Missouri StateL21-28-10.718633.502-60-0.17
11@Middle TennesseeW56-30-16.015684.520.29
12vsLibertyW34-27-9.018844.711500.00
13vsJacksonville StateW27-21-6.7211356.4121800.30
14vsSam HoustonW56-16-27.8151248.300.12
20vsUTSAL20-573.78364.50150

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
25.4%
Passing plays
5.0%
Rushing plays
46.2%
Standard downs
29.3%
Passing downs
17.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.07
Passing downs
0.49
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.24 / 0.20

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.