Skip to content
Kedrick Reescano
Kedrick Reescano

#3Kedrick Reescano

Kedrick Reescano is a Explosive Back for Arizona. Kedrick's 2025 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 82 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kedrick Reescano's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
396 Rush yards9 Rush TD84 Carries4.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
3 Receptions12 Rec yards0 Rec TD4.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume35
  • Explosiveness34
  • Consistency45
  • Receiving12
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency45th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.63 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Colorado (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6300.63Wk 1 vs Hawai'i: +0.35 EPA/play1Wk 6 vs Oklahoma State: -0.60 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs BYU: +0.47 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Houston: +0.08 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Colorado: +0.63 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Kansas: +0.49 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Cincinnati: +0.17 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Baylor: +0.13 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Arizona State: -0.03 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsHawai'iW40-61.710515.110.35
6vsOklahoma StateW41-13-15.1242.00-0.60
7vsBYUL27-3315.913906.910.47
8@HoustonL28-317.411322.910.08
10@ColoradoW52-17-8.35224.410.63
11vsKansasW24-204.15316.200.49
12@CincinnatiW30-244.513947.211900.17
13vsBaylorW41-171.413463.530.13
14@Arizona StateW23-73.911242.21100-0.03
20vsSMUL19-2413.4122.00130

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.3%
Passing plays
0.8%
Rushing plays
25.2%
Standard downs
15.3%
Passing downs
5.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
-0.06
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.01 / 0.20

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.