Skip to content
Kadarius Calloway
Kadarius Calloway

#1Kadarius Calloway

Kadarius Calloway is a Committee Back for New Mexico State.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kadarius Calloway's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
450 Rush yards3 Rush TD117 Carries3.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
26 Receptions175 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.7 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns16 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume49
  • Explosiveness16
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving63
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Peak game: 0.44 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Liberty (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7900.79Wk 1 vs Bryant: -0.05 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tulsa: -0.79 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Louisiana Tech: -0.38 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs New Mexico: +0.05 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Sam Houston: +0.15 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Liberty: +0.44 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Missouri State: +0.13 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Western Kentucky: -0.38 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Kennesaw State: +0.07 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Tennessee: +0.10 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UTEP: +0.11 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Middle Tennessee: -0.36 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsBryantW19-312504.21-0.05
2vsTulsaW21-14-10.05-3-0.60130-0.79
3@Louisiana TechL14-49-1.37111.60160-0.38
5@New MexicoL20-380.98344.3031200.05
6vsSam HoustonW37-10-27.815664.4154400.15
8@LibertyL27-30-9.018844.711100.44
9vsMissouri StateL17-24-10.710505.0021600.13
10@Western KentuckyL16-351.6561.20180-0.38
11vsKennesaw StateL21-24-5.48273.4054400.07
12@TennesseeL9-4215.04194.801500.10
13@UTEPW34-31-17.516694.3031400.11
14vsMiddle TennesseeL24-31-16.09374.103220-0.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.2%
Passing plays
6.0%
Rushing plays
34.9%
Standard downs
19.7%
Passing downs
12.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.00
Passing downs
-0.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.10 / -0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.