Skip to content
Joey Aguilar

#6Joey Aguilar

QB·Tennessee·202520238.4 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Joey Aguilar is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Tennessee. Joey's 2025 season ranks in the 83th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 460 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Joey Aguilar's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
272/404 Comp/Att3565 Pass yards24 Pass TD10 INT67.3% Comp %
Rushing
101 Rush yards4 Rush TD71 Carries1.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency83
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat54
  • Consistency88
  • Clutch77
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)83th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency88th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (83th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.91 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Kentucky (SP+ 2).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9100.91Wk 1 vs Syracuse: +0.55 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs East Tennessee State: +0.55 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia: +0.53 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UAB: +0.51 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Mississippi State: +0.50 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Arkansas: +0.51 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Alabama: +0.12 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Kentucky: +0.91 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Oklahoma: +0.27 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs New Mexico State: +0.43 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Florida: +0.54 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Vanderbilt: +0.27 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSyracuseW45-26-13.116/282473062.33400.55
2vsEast Tennessee StateW72-1723/312882074.40.55
3vsGeorgiaL41-4424.124/363714285.9-810.53
4vsUABW56-24-15.815/222183159.41100.51
5@Mississippi StateW41-344.124/403351267.72110.50
7vsArkansasW34-315.116/252211074.95900.51
8@AlabamaL20-3714.828/442681161.6-2000.12
9@KentuckyW56-341.820/263963095.3-600.91
10vsOklahomaL27-3318.329/453933274.3-600.27
12vsNew Mexico StateW42-9-15.517/232041276.03410.43
13@FloridaW31-113.517/222041094.9000.54
14vsVanderbiltL24-4520.329/442991065.6-1500.27
20vsIllinoisL28-3012.914/181210064.4-31

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
49.6%
Passing plays
92.4%
Rushing plays
10.6%
Standard downs
44.4%
Passing downs
64.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.35
Passing downs
0.53
Pass / Rush EPA
0.44 / 0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.040−0.132025
EPA per play · 2023 — 2025 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023App State
8.2
259.8
2025Tennessee
8.4
199.1

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.