Skip to content
Jeremy Hecklinski
Jeremy Hecklinski

#10Jeremy Hecklinski

QB·Iowa·2025

Jeremy Hecklinski is a Volume Passer for Iowa.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jeremy Hecklinski's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
2/2 Comp/Att8 Pass yards0 Pass TD0 INT100.0% Comp %
Rushing
6 Rush yards1 Rush TD1 Carries6.0 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

15
Attempts
7.7y
Avg depth
8.6y
After catch
47%
Catch rate

The ball travels 7.7 yards in the air on an average throw 0.8 yards shorter than the median. Another 8.6 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
0% · 0y
0
1
0% · 0y
short
3
100% · 23y
5
20% · 16y
5
60% · 37y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume7
  • Dual-Threat20
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch40
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)
Key findings
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Peak game: 1.34 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Minnesota (SP+ 2).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.3401.34Wk 7 vs Wisconsin: -0.15 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Minnesota: +1.34 EPA/play9
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
7@WisconsinW37-0-4.41/120081.5-0.15
9vsMinnesotaW41-31.51/160099.9611.34

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
2.5%
Passing plays
4.3%
Rushing plays
1.4%
Standard downs
1.2%
Passing downs
5.9%

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.