Skip to content
Jeremiah Franklin
Jeremiah Franklin

#17Jeremiah Franklin

Jeremiah Franklin is a Versatile TE for Boston College. Jeremiah's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 68 plays — a elite rate for the TE.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jeremiah Franklin's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
48 Receptions489 Rec yards2 Rec TD10.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume24
  • Explosiveness21
  • Consistency34
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency34th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.27 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.19 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Georgia Tech (SP+ 9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan MyersRice0.2700.215.9
Jackson AckerWisconsin0.2100.115.3
Johnny LanganRutgers0.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming0.2900.521.8
D'Vaughn PennamonOle Miss0.2000.011.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1901.19Wk 1 vs Fordham: +0.67 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Michigan State: +0.51 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Stanford: +0.03 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs California: +0.04 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Pittsburgh: -0.38 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Clemson: -0.15 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UConn: -0.16 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Louisville: +0.74 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Notre Dame: -0.05 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs SMU: -0.56 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Georgia Tech: +1.19 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Syracuse: +1.18 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsFordhamW66-1055010.00210.67
2@Michigan StateL40-42-3.488410.51180.51
3@StanfordL20-30-11.86416.80130.03
5vsCaliforniaL24-28-3.211414.00140.04
6@PittsburghL7-488.423517.5032-0.38
7vsClemsonL10-419.52168.008-0.15
8vsUConnL23-385.122613.0016-0.16
9@LouisvilleL24-3812.455511.01210.74
10vsNotre DameL10-2524.47466.608-0.05
11vsSMUL13-4513.43186.007-0.56
12vsGeorgia TechL34-369.345814.50301.19
14@SyracuseW34-12-13.134615.30251.18

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.4%
Passing plays
14.6%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
7.1%
Passing downs
11.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.09
Passing downs
0.51
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.