Skip to content
Je'Quan Burton

#8Je'Quan Burton

Je'Quan Burton is a Versatile WR for Florida Atlantic. Je'Quan's 2023 season produced 15.1 total EPA across 41 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Je'Quan Burton's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
24 Receptions277 Rec yards2 Rec TD11.5 Yards/rec
Returns
11 Kick returns190 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume23
  • Explosiveness30
  • Consistency46
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency46th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.14 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.15 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Monmouth.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3700.615.2
Micah DavisAir Force0.3700.616.3
Cade HarrisAir Force0.3300.514.8
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3200.412.5
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.1502.15Wk 1 vs Monmouth: +2.15 EPA/play1Wk 4 vs Illinois: -0.20 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Tulsa: -1.13 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs South Florida: +1.24 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UTSA: +0.98 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs UAB: +0.07 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs East Carolina: +0.19 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Tulane: +0.85 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsMonmouthW42-2035618.72352.15
4@IllinoisL17-23-2.555410.8034-0.20
6vsTulsaW20-17-13.7-1.13
7@South FloridaW56-14-6.62157.50151.24
8vsUTSAL10-365.456813.60390.98
9@CharlotteW38-16-21.4
10@UABL42-45-14.733712.30160.07
11vsEast CarolinaL7-22-12.85397.80130.19
12vsTulaneL8-242.8188.0080.85

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.0%
Passing plays
14.7%
Rushing plays
0.4%
Standard downs
6.8%
Passing downs
10.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.12
Passing downs
0.94
Pass / Rush EPA
0.35 / 0.88

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.